Expression of Resistance Through Fashion
“Fashion designers are also no strangers to using impracticality as a method to challenge the conventionalities of their industry as well. Ugliness and impracticality are loud acts of defiance in fashion that demand further inquiries and information.”
By: Yaseen El-Hakim
We inhabit a world where the ideology of the individual is dominant. However, almost ironically, we also take pride in the groups that we belong to and source our identities from. Communication and expression of these identities have been important in demonstrating our thoughts and feelings on certain subjects. One particularly distinct mode of expression for people has been their fashion sense. Communicating visually is a hallmark of human life, allowing us to absorb information quickly. So think about the way you dress. You likely are communicating several pieces of information about yourself even if you don’t necessarily dress for other people. Considering that, fashion is simultaneously a mode in which we can flout the norms and rules of not just fashion or culture, but also the societies in which we live. Think of Iranian women who have gotten attention on social media for being photographed without headdresses in public or the white suits of the suffragettes (Melero, 2024). From the arguably terrible to the utterly refreshing, let me outline resistance’s pervasiveness in fashion.
On a foundational level, fashion trends becoming popular are key to us practicing our social identity and belonging. Even if they appear impractical, they can create a sense of tribalism or belonging to an in-group (Gomaa, 2021). Trends usually are about being part of a larger collective group rather than part of an othered group (Young, 1956). This is the usual interpretation of any fashion trend that garners any sort of popularity. However, this notion still holds for the groups that splinter themselves away from the larger collective consciousness. People feel more courageous to break away from the group and resist when others can support them in their rebelliousness. Humans have increased their chances of survival and prosperity by associating with groups rather than being strictly independent. Think about those ripped jeans and how they might have never caught on if at least a certain number of people had donned them. Novelty and individuation also paradoxically fit together with social identity and belonging in fashion. Dressing in whatever is trendy is a technique allowing people to adapt socially (Young, 1956). So, balancing your individuality and belongingness is a constant in fashion. An unconventional aesthetic subverting a cultural norm gets the attention of others but also simultaneously communicates to others what ideological group one might belong to as well.
The pressures of fashion trends these days are very intense. Social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok put the onus of keeping up with the latest styles on consumers. Challenging norms and power structures through tools like social media and fashion, though, is still very much possible. Using perceived ugliness and inelegance, groups can challenge traditional depictions of beauty often touted by dominant social groups and actors (Bernstein, 2024; Trewartha-Weiner, 2024). Fashion designers are also no strangers to using impracticality as a method to challenge the conventionalities of their industry. Ugliness and impracticality are loud acts of defiance in fashion that demand further inquiries and information. They attract attention effectively from normal people and allow people on the fringes of society to get a grip on the social narrative. Think of how that type of attention has benefited marginalized people and oppressed communities.
Rebelliousness in fashion often targets consumerism, too. As an ideology, consumerism reinforces conformity onto anyone who seeks a product, whether it is needed or not. This gives rise to products that essentially have no unique traits and can be described as a mass-produced global form of nothing. For those who reject consumerism, there are many ways that one can express this sentiment through other producers. For example, the DIY trend in the punk movement shows that people are capable of making their clothes with personality and don’t have to buy from larger retailers (Trewartha-Weiner, 2024). Another long-standing trend is thrifting, which is upcycling clothes, demonstrating that buying apparel year-on-year is unnecessary and wasteful. Wearing those clothes and communicating that they are thrifted for anyone who cares to know also acts as a way of not just rejecting consumerism but also of the deplorable conditions for workers who mass-produce items, of companies’ poor environmental practices, and of contributing to the poor mental health of those who value keeping up to date with fashion styles.
There are many ways that political resistance can be expressed via fashion. One topic that fashion perpetually runs a discourse about is gender. Adopting fashion that defies traditional gender expectations, such as androgynous or gender-fluid styles, can be a form of resistance against societal constraints on gender expression (Melero, 2024). The LGBTQ+ community can and has used fashion as a way to subvert traditional gender norms, blurring the lines between masculinity and femininity. A woman merely wearing a well-tailored suit demonstrated the desire for women to break the glass-ceiling and enter a previously exclusively male workplace, for instance. Fashion trends oftentimes carry political statements with them, such as the recent UN Fashion Show by Palestinian designer Jamal Taslaq expressing support for Palestinians in the wake of the ongoing genocide in Gaza (Grimston, 2024). Unconventional fashion choices have often had political weight to them. For example, the oversized zoot suits of the 1940s were popularized by Mexican-American youth, becoming a symbol of cultural defiance against the dominant white American majority in the United States. Their flashiness brought attention to the presence and marginalization of Mexican-Americans and Latinos, causing such a stir that it resulted in the Zoot Suit Riots of 1943, where Mexican-Americans were attacked for wearing the suits. Such events and reactions from dominant social actors to simply what people wear speaks to how much importance we put on fashion.
If any of these examples of how to express resistance via fashion are indicating anything, it’s that defiance can be expressed fairly readily. Once upon a time, making what you wore comfortable instead of stylized was seen as inflammatory. That’s hard to believe now since people today spend a good portion of their time in comfortable clothes even when they work. Nevertheless, back in the early 20th century, clothing that was less constraining physically and aesthetically for women represented a separation from traditional gender roles and a move toward emancipation (Grimston, 2024). Now, there is more understanding that fashion comfort is a benefit to all people in terms of better quality of life, more practicality, and a higher potential for fringe ideas to enter mainstream thought. It took a bit of time for comfort in fashion to become normalized for many people, but the fact that it has worked its way to becoming accepted exhibits the potential for even the most outlandish ideas to become acceptable.
So, I don’t know if you are thinking about becoming a revolutionary any time soon, but I’ve illustrated a simple way people have been revolutionary. There is something important that needs to be said regarding being honest and speaking your thoughts, especially when it comes to being rebellious. Confronting whomever, or whatever, it is you want to confront is something you do despite fear or anxiety. There are moments in life where we can properly convey our true thoughts, but they are far fewer than most of us would like. In an age where information is constantly being produced and stored away to one day be forgotten, you may as well be upfront. So, wear what you want.
YME Volunteer 2024
"Hands down, one of the best educational non-profits that impact underprivileged youth, in a manner very few other organizations are able to do so"